Most bar associations treat sending client documents to consumer AI as a confidentiality risk. SureCiteAI gives solo attorneys and small firms private AI search across contracts, filings, and matter files — with citations on every answer.
From $39/month · No credit card · Solo attorneys to 30-lawyer firms
Every lawyer has tried ChatGPT. Most have quietly stopped using it for real client work. Here's why.
Model Rule 1.6 and most state analogues treat feeding unredacted client documents into consumer LLMs as a confidentiality problem. Several state bars have issued formal opinions in 2023–2025 saying so.
ChatGPT will invent case citations. Mata v. Avianca was not the last time. You cannot file a brief citing a source you can't verify.
One ChatGPT thread sees everything you've ever pasted. No matter-level isolation. Not defensible if a client ever asks what happened to their documents.
Not a wrapper around ChatGPT. A purpose-built document intelligence platform where privacy is the default, not an add-on.
Your firm's documents live in a fully isolated workspace — not just a filter in the app, but isolation enforced by the database itself. Another firm on SureCiteAI cannot query your data, and every document is additionally protected with an encryption key unique to your workspace.
Ask “what's our indemnification cap with Acme?” and get back the answer plus a link to Section 8.3 of the MSA, page 4. If the answer isn't in the documents, SureCiteAI refuses to guess rather than fabricate.
Separate subdomain per client or matter — acme.sureciteai.com, smith-case.sureciteai.com. Shared UI, isolated documents, isolated AI context. When a matter closes, archive the workspace in one click.
Contractually guaranteed. Documents are used only for your searches. We use OpenRouter with data-retention disabled across every LLM provider we route through. No ambiguity, no fine print.
Every query and every answer is logged with user, timestamp, and source citations. If you ever need to demonstrate how a document was used, it's one database query away.
PDFs (including scanned/image PDFs via OCR), Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and email exports. Up to 100MB per file on higher tiers. Your M&A data room uploads as-is.
“What's the liability cap in the Acme MSA, and how does it compare to the Zenith contract?”
Answer with both clauses quoted, both source documents linked, in under 10 seconds. No reading 80 pages.
“List every change-of-control provision in the acquisition data room.”
Ranked list across all 400+ documents, each finding cited to its specific contract and section. Replaces three days of associate work.
“Has this client had any prior disputes with a counterparty named in their new matter?”
Cross-searches old matter files (if uploaded) with citations, flagging conflicts before they become ethical issues.
“What arguments did we make on the statute-of-limitations issue in the Harrison case?”
Exact passages from your prior briefs, with page references ready to adapt to the new filing.
Most firms start on Solo or Team. Upgrade when your matter count grows.
Solo attorneys, of-counsel, contract reviewers
Boutique firms (2–10 attorneys)
Mid-size firms with multiple matters
Harvey and Casetext/Lexis+ AI are research tools — they search case law and legal databases. SureCiteAI searches your documents: contracts, filings, client files, deposition transcripts. They complement each other. Many firms run both. SureCiteAI is priced for solo and small-firm use; Harvey starts in the thousands per seat.
SureCiteAI stores your documents; it doesn't share them with anyone. You're the custodian. Our logging gives you a full audit trail of who searched what and when — which is typically an asset in discovery, not a liability. For sensitive matters, use the per-matter workspace feature (Business plan and up) so one matter's documents aren't co-resident with another's.
Use it the way you'd use a paralegal's research: as a starting point that you verify. Every answer cites the exact source document and page, so verification is fast. Never file an AI-generated answer without checking the citation — but the same is true of a human draft.
30-day read-only window to export everything. Then a hard delete across every storage system we use — documents, search index, and backups. You get a deletion confirmation email. We keep nothing.
Yes — the trial uses the same tenant-isolated infrastructure as paid plans. Use it with real documents so you can actually evaluate it. You can delete the workspace after the trial if you don't continue.
Practical guides for attorneys evaluating AI for private document search.
Big-law tools like Harvey and CoCounsel are built for AmLaw 100 budgets. Here's what 10–75 attorney firms actually need from AI contract review.
Read the guide →Legal teams spend 60% of their time searching across contracts and case files. Here's how AI document search eliminates that bottleneck — with source citations.
Read the guide →Most AI document tools answer confidently even when they're wrong. Here's why citations matter, and what the difference looks like in practice.
Read the guide →21 days, no credit card. Upload actual documents. If it doesn't save you time, don't pay.
Start free trialSureCiteAI is a document intelligence platform. It is not a law firm, does not provide legal advice, and its output is not a substitute for the independent judgment of a licensed attorney. Attorneys remain solely responsible for compliance with the ABA Model Rules, applicable state rules of professional conduct, and the duty to supervise technology assistants (Model Rule 5.3).